<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gmail password strength check</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.saardrimer.com/index.php/g-mail-paswword-security-check_129/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.saardrimer.com/index.php/g-mail-paswword-security-check_129/</link>
	<description>you get what you pay for</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:35:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jetman</title>
		<link>http://weblog.saardrimer.com/index.php/g-mail-paswword-security-check_129/comment-page-1/#comment-64409</link>
		<dc:creator>Jetman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saardrimer.com/wordpress/?p=129#comment-64409</guid>
		<description>Hi, men!
I found another two password strength checkers. Their algorithm based on words dictionary. Try one at microsoft.com - http://www.microsoft.com/protect/yourself/password/checker.mspx and one at itsimpl.com - http://www.itsimpl.com
Jetman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, men!<br />
I found another two password strength checkers. Their algorithm based on words dictionary. Try one at microsoft.com &#8211; <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/protect/yourself/password/checker.mspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/protect/yourself/password/checker.mspx</a> and one at itsimpl.com &#8211; <a href="http://www.itsimpl.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.itsimpl.com</a><br />
Jetman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saar Drimer</title>
		<link>http://weblog.saardrimer.com/index.php/g-mail-paswword-security-check_129/comment-page-1/#comment-23852</link>
		<dc:creator>Saar Drimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saardrimer.com/wordpress/?p=129#comment-23852</guid>
		<description>Simon,

There is a danger in training people to bad standards or practices. For example, phishing. For quite some time banks have been sending emails to their customers with links in them. This, in turn, has enabled phishermen to lure these customers into their hooks, so to speak, by embedding links that direct to their own mock web pages to harvest passwords.

So, while I see your point, I&#039;d rather this feature not be there just for the sake of not giving people the false impression that a bad (or a slightly less bad) choice of password is actually a good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon,</p>
<p>There is a danger in training people to bad standards or practices. For example, phishing. For quite some time banks have been sending emails to their customers with links in them. This, in turn, has enabled phishermen to lure these customers into their hooks, so to speak, by embedding links that direct to their own mock web pages to harvest passwords.</p>
<p>So, while I see your point, I&#8217;d rather this feature not be there just for the sake of not giving people the false impression that a bad (or a slightly less bad) choice of password is actually a good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://weblog.saardrimer.com/index.php/g-mail-paswword-security-check_129/comment-page-1/#comment-23789</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 04:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saardrimer.com/wordpress/?p=129#comment-23789</guid>
		<description>&gt; In these cases, I usually rather they put nothing at all than something weak like this.

I totally disagree.

Something that goes some way towards guiding users towards using secure passwords is better than nothing?

It might not guide all users to a more secure password, but if it guides some proportion of users to a more secure password, that is a Good Thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; In these cases, I usually rather they put nothing at all than something weak like this.</p>
<p>I totally disagree.</p>
<p>Something that goes some way towards guiding users towards using secure passwords is better than nothing?</p>
<p>It might not guide all users to a more secure password, but if it guides some proportion of users to a more secure password, that is a Good Thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emergent Chaos</title>
		<link>http://weblog.saardrimer.com/index.php/g-mail-paswword-security-check_129/comment-page-1/#comment-1185</link>
		<dc:creator>Emergent Chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saardrimer.com/wordpress/?p=129#comment-1185</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Don&#039;t Tell People What Not To Do!...&lt;/strong&gt;

It&#039;s rare to see a substantial usability mistake at Google, and so this jumped out at me. Saar Drimer has a post on the new &quot;Gmail password strength check,&quot; in which he quotes Google&#039;s password advice: Don&#8217;t use a password......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Don&#8217;t Tell People What Not To Do!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s rare to see a substantial usability mistake at Google, and so this jumped out at me. Saar Drimer has a post on the new &#8220;Gmail password strength check,&#8221; in which he quotes Google&#8217;s password advice: Don&rsquo;t use a password&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

